Gyanvapi Row: HC Grants 8 Weeks To ASI For Reply On Safe Evaluation Of ‘Shivling’

Justice J J Munir fixed March 20 as the next date of hearing after the counsel for ASI sought more time to file its response.

The high court was hearing a civil revision petition filed by Laxmi Devi and three others challenging a Varanasi court order that had rejected the demand for carbon dating and scientific determination of the purported 'Shivling' found during a court-mandated survey of Gyanvapi mosque premises on May 16, 2022.

On November 21, the counsel for ASI had made an oral submission before the high court stating that the ASI is still contemplating with its experts as to what methods could be adopted to determine the age of the purported 'Shivling'.

In view of it, he had sought further time of three months to submit ASI DG's opinion as to whether a safe evaluation of the age of the purported 'Shivling' could be done by adopting a scientific methodology.

The petitioners have challenged a Varanasi court's October 14 order rejecting Hindu worshippers' plea for conducting a scientific probe of the 'Shivling'.

The high court had on November 4 sought the response of ASI in the matter and directed the ASI DG to submit his opinion whether investigation of the said structure, if examined through carbon dating, ground-penetrating radar (GPR), excavation and other methods adopted to determine its age, nature and other relevant information, is likely to damage it or a safe evaluation about its age can be done.